I know what you're thinking: how can we implement Reference Lines or 3D grids, which would likely be driven by end points that are sometimes shared among separate lines/grids and would want to be controlled by a shared POINT, if Reference POINTS aren't accessible at the Project Level? Answer: Reference POINTS should be accessible at Project Level, be namable, and be autonomous to move independent of Reference Planes. In addition, after POLYLINES have been implemented in Revit, Multi-segmented grids could be made on the fly by joining grid segments- this could work for 2D AND 3D grids. Then, add the rest of grid functionality (category assignment, grid bubble tagging options, breaks in grid per view, as well as structural member association). After that, allowing Reference Lines to be NAMED would be even better (as well as allowing access to a reference line's workplanes, both along its length and perpendicular planes at its ends, by Name). Seems like inclusion of REFERENCE LINES at the Project Level would be a start. Looks like Levels has been accepted, but we still have to sell everybody on 3D grids:Īllowing 3-dimensional Gridlines would be very powerful.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |